Other trusted resources helpful for identifying well-regarded journals include MEDLINE, managed by the National Library of Medicine, Journal Citation Reports, and WorldCat.Īdditional resources include Think Check Submit, which provides guidance on how to choose reputable publishers, Journal Reviewer, which is an aggregation of real-world experiences with academic journals intended to inform others’ decision-making, and Sherpa Romeo which provides insight into the policies of open access journals. The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), founded in 2003 by a group at Lund University in Sweden, is a whitelist of reputable open access publishers. However, the list remains accessible and since then additional “predatory” journal blacklists and whitelists have been established.īlacklists of suspected “predatory” journals include those maintained by the Norwegian Scientific Index (“level X” publishers) and Cabells International. Librarians at the City University of New York pointed out “fuzziness between low-quality and predatory publishers” and suggested whitelisting, or establishing a list of verified journals with high quality standards, as an alternative to the blacklisting provided by Beall’s List.ĭue to contention, Jeffrey Beall removed his list and blog from the internet. While some argued that the results of the experiment supported Beall’s mission, others noted that “predatory” journal lists could be falsely accusatory of legitimate academic journals. Known as “ Beall’s List,” the reference resource listed journals found to have questionable integrity based on a set of criteria intended to identify journals with unethical practices. In 2008, Jeffrey Beall, a librarian at the University of Colorado, started a list of “potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers” on his blog Scholarly Open Access. This article lists previously identified “predatory” journals, outlines trusted resources for finding reputable journals, and provides insight into both the history of “predatory” journal lists and current contention surrounding the topic. For both the scientific community and the academic journals that publish their research findings, integrity is paramount, and deceptive practices on the part of either party can be severely prohibitive to the advancement of science.įor-profit journals with questionable credentials and publishing practices, coined “predatory journals,” have been identified by multiple groups.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |